Kinder Eggs Us Navigationsmenü
are banned in the. Bringing Kinder Surprise eggs into the US can incur a fine of hundreds of dollars because the famous chocolates with toys inside are illegal. Get the best deals on Kinder Surprise when you shop the largest online selection at meganwest.co US Kinder Egg Surprise Toys Lot Of Das US-Zollamt weist regelmäßig darauf hin, dass Kinder "Surprise Eggs" nicht ins Land dürfen. Erst vor wenigen Tagen erließ es "Einfuhr-. Aktuell erklärt sie bei Youtube die Unterschiede zwischen dem verbotenen "Kinder Surprise Egg" und dem legalen "Kinder Joy". Das gibt es.
Kinder Überraschung ist ein Produkt der italienischen Firma Ferrero. Weitere Bezeichnungen sind in Deutschland die allgemeine Bezeichnung Überraschungsei (kurz: Ü-Ei) und im Ausland Kinder Surprise, Kinder Sorpresa (dort umgangssprachlich auch Kinder Egg Der Import in die USA wird für Privatpersonen mit bis zu US-Dollar. Get the best deals on Kinder Surprise when you shop the largest online selection at meganwest.co US Kinder Egg Surprise Toys Lot Of Doch nun scheint sich das Kinder Joy als geeignetes Produkt für die lang ersehnte US-Markt-Einführung herauszustellen. Denn bei diesem Produkt ist das Objekt. Kinder Überraschung ist ein Produkt der italienischen Firma Ferrero. Weitere Bezeichnungen sind in Deutschland die allgemeine Bezeichnung Überraschungsei (kurz: Ü-Ei) und im Ausland Kinder Surprise, Kinder Sorpresa (dort umgangssprachlich auch Kinder Egg Der Import in die USA wird für Privatpersonen mit bis zu US-Dollar. Kinder Egg Surprise and Friends Advent Calendar, g: meganwest.co: US USA Candy Advent Calendar I Christmas Calendar American Candy with - kinder surprise eggs disneycollector. Kinder Überraschung Schokoladeneier in den USA verboten? - My gift ideas - Süße Rezepte für. Doch nun scheint sich das Kinder Joy als geeignetes Produkt für die lang ersehnte US-Markt-Einführung herauszustellen. Denn bei diesem Produkt ist das Objekt.
Kinder Eggs Us VideoOpening an Illegal Kinder Surprise Egg in the United States
You can find our Community Guidelines in full here. London after Lockdown. Food for London. The Londoner. The Reader. Matthew d'Ancona.
Ayesha Hazarika. Rohan Silva. Ellen E Jones. Laura Weir. Tottenham Hotspur. Crystal Palace. West Ham.
Transfer News. Premier League. Champions League. Rugby Union. Horse Racing. A List. ES Magazine. Staying In. TV reviews. Music news.
London Indoors. Things to do. Healthy at Home. ES Best. For the uninitiated, Kinder Eggs are a chocolate treat widely available throughout Europe, Mexico and Canada, with the company that makes them, Ferrero perhaps better known in the U.
So why is a beloved candy the world over explicitly banned in the land of the free? In a nut-or in this case egg-shell, Kinder Eggs are illegal in the states because they break a rule in the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.
It was made law on the back of several highly publicised cases of poisoning, most notably the deaths of people the majority of whom were children in what became known as the The Elixir Sulfanilamide Incident.
It had long been known that the previous laws the FDA were operating under, most notably the Pure Food and Drugs Act of , were woefully inadequate for protecting consumers, but the Elixir Sulfanilamide Incident sparked major public awareness of the issue.
So what happened? It was later massively beneficial in reducing infection and mortality rates in WWII. However, in an attempt to create a liquid version of the drug it normally came in either powder or tablet form , the lead chemist at S.
Massengill Company, Harold Cole Watkins, mixed it with diethylene glycol, commonly used today in antifreeze and as a solvent.
He chose it owing to how well sulfanilamide dissolved in the substance and because diethylene glycol tastes slightly sweet. In this case, even animal testing would not have been required to discover the substance was toxic.
Watkins would have merely needed to do a surface level look into the compound, with several previous published studies noting diethylene glycol, even in relatively small doses, would cause kidney damage and potentially failure of said organ.
But no such due-diligence research nor testing to determine the safety of such an elixir before putting it on the market was required at the time.
Blissfully unaware that they were about to start selling a tasty tonic of death to their customers, S. Massengill sent out shipments of the elixir in the autumn of to pharmacists across the nation.
Massengill Co, resulting in them issuing telegrams requesting the elixir be sent back for a full refund, though not disclosing to pharmacists the seriousness of the issue if they ignored the telegram.
This all was capped by a short and truly heart wrenching letter by one Marie Nidiffer to President Franklin D.
Roosevelt describing what happened in the days following administering the drug to her 6 year old daughter, who at the time was suffering from a sore throat:.
The first time I ever had occasion to call in a doctor for [Joan] and she was given Elixir of Sulfanilamide.
All that is left to us is the caring for her little grave. Even the memory of her is mixed with sorrow for we can see her little body tossing to and fro and hear that little voice screaming with pain and it seems as though it would drive me insane.
As for Dr. Samual Evans Massengill, who owned S. Massengill Co. My chemists and I deeply regret the fatal results, but there was no error in the manufacture of the product.
We have been supplying a legitimate professional demand and no one could have foreseen the unlooked-for results.
I do not feel that there was any responsibility on our part…. Needless to say, when all this came to light, the public were more than a little outraged, with S.
To add to the tragedy, it appears Harold Watkins did not quite have the clear conscience of Dr. Massengill, with Watkins sadly committing suicide not long after it came to light that his error had resulted in the deaths of over people.
In the end, the Elixir Sulfanilamide Incident was the final straw, spurring the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to hopefully prevent such a tragedy from occurring again.
The Act also included a small section explicitly banning the sale of any confectionery that contains either alcohol except in limited quantities, as an amazing number of things we all eat every day actually contain trace amounts of alcohol and banning any consumable product that:.
The exceptions mentioned are things like the stick of a Tootsie Pop which is embedded in the candy item, but serves a purpose and otherwise has been deemed not to make the product dangerous.
Kinder Eggs, on the other hand, are essentially a chocolate, egg-shaped shell that contains a hard plastic egg, inside of which is a small toy.
The answer there is actually yes, there are a handful of such occasions- though it appears never having to do with a child eating the egg and not realizing there was a toy inside.
The size of the egg makes that scenario an unlikely proposition. Paramedics were able to resuscitate her, but she later died of brain damage caused by asphyxiation.
The toy was meant to be constructed by the child. However, after investigation into whether this particular confectionery should be banned, the UK Department of Trade and Industry issued a report, among other things noting,.
This tragic death emphasizes again the need for parental vigilance. Unsurprisingly, this law has been challenged, most notably by Nestle, who in introduced a product called Nestle Magic essentially a not-so-subtle ripoff of the Kinder Surprise, comprising of a chocolate ball with a plastic casing inside that contained a tiny Disney character toy.
Their position was backed by a report from the Consumer Product Safety Commission, who did their due diligence on the candy and determined it, and the non-edible item inside, were not a choking hazard.
We believe we have an honest disagreement on a technical issue. Nestle also attempted a political lobbying blitz to change the law, including trying to get Congress to embed wording in an Agricultural Appropriations bill that would have made their product legal, with Representative George Nethercutt of Washington state, whose district just so happened to include a large Nestle plant employing hundreds of voters, championing the tweak in wording.
Although Mars ultimately claimed to be acting out of concern for the public, they initially denied having anything to do with the campaign to confirm the candy was illegal.
It was only later that it emerged that Mars had, in fact, attempted to fund the case put forward by public interest groups, at first behind the scenes before their involvement was discovered.
Ultimately Nestle was forced to take the product off the shelves, with precedents such as this making it practically guaranteed that Kinder Eggs will, at least for the foreseeable future, not be available for sale in the United States.
This has resulted in a small, but thriving black market for the candy due to the toys inside being highly collectable, as well as the fact that it makes for a great candy to put in an Easter basket particularly.
This said, such heavy-handed punishments are rare and in most cases the eggs will simply be confiscated by customs agents.
However, according to a self-described Kinder Egg smuggler called Joe Wos, he has on at least one occasion been allowed to enter the US with the toys contained inside Kinder Eggs.
In this case, the customs agents in question made him eat all of the eggs, rather than just allowing him to discard the chocolate in the trash and take the toys.
Bonus Facts:. I live in Canada and Kinder eggs are very popular here — you see them at every supermarket checkout, Walmart, etc. I buy chocolate eggs with a big plastic egg inside with a toy in the plastic egg all the time at Walmart in Iowa.
They are Yowie brand, not Kinder, but my daughter loves them anyway. Yes, I was wondering the same thing. I actually looked into Yowie and saw that they had a patent that allowed them to sell their similar product although the two chocolate sides are indeed separated, only held together by the foil wrapping , but this patent expires in They seem to be working on another patent that already has FDA approval.
Or are they just waiting until the patent expires in ?